I flagged this now deleted answer as Not an answer.
The flag was declined ("Declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it"). But others also marked the answer as Not an answer (in review), and the answer was deleted by a moderator. So there is evidence to support it, including evidence that comes from a moderator.
I also flagged this now deleted answer as probably AI-generated. The flag was declined ("Declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it"). But others also downvoted the answer and voted to delete it, and the answer ultimately was deleted by a moderator. So there is evidence to support it, including evidence that comes from a moderator.
I feel like this is unfair. In my opinion, both flags were helpful (and correct), and since a moderator did respond to both in the way that I suggested (i.e. delete them), I should be credited, not penalized. Maybe the flagging system has gotten a little out of whack...?